
Four senators have sent a letter to Michael Copps asking the FCC Commissioner to
decide if wireless carriers having exclusive partnerships with phone companies is fair to the consumer, in anticipation of a Commerce Committee meeting this week.
Translation: Should AT&T be the only carrier that gets to sell the iPhone?
The notion is actually the byproduct of a petition from the Rural Cellular Association, a group of small carriers that service the parts of the country the Big Four wireless companies do not. By not being able to offer customers the phones of their choice, they argue, it makes it difficult for them to compete with larger carriers when their markets overlap.
It's certainly fair to consumers to have the most choice, especially when carriers have created a false economy to force customers into long-term contracts through the sale of "subsidized" phones. But it might be a sticky for the manufacturers of the phones—would Apple, for instance, be forced to make different models of iPhone that worked with other wireless standards like Verizon's CDMA?
There's much going on here, and I've been trying to research a similar vein ever since the iPhone 3G S was announced last week. (I even have been in touch with the office of Senator Amy Klobuchar, one of the signers of this letter to the FCC, but getting an answer back from an official's office when you write for "Boing Boing" is sometimes tricky.)
Not sure this was prompted by the announcement of the new iPhone on AT&T?
via: BBGadgets
That's pretty cool that Minnesota's own (and only seated) senator Amy Klobuchar is working on this. if the iPhone does go to other carriers, it'll be interesting to see whether Verizon and Sprint will enable GSM (or sim card capable devices) phones for their networks..
Read more!